Hi, thanks for trying to help me to understand. Why
buddists still want to strive to improve their karma when food
chain is karma and natural death is not considered suffering?
Does the apex shape of the organisation from demi-gods to the
lowest animal forms keep out disorderly improvement of karma
advancement. How does nature ensure justice in rewarding
karma?
I don't quite understand your questions. Buddhists did not
interrupt the animals' food chain. Humans should not be in the
animals' food chain. We can survive by being a vegetarian. Natural
death is considered suffering in Buddhism 生老病死苦. Killing them is
more suffering than natural death but natural death is also
suffering.
Karma is not 1 + 1=2, it is not so straight forward and only the
enlighten ones or Buddhas are able to discern karma.
Doing good deeds is only part of Buddhism, Buddhism emphasize
more on wisdom. Thus, do good deeds with wisdom. Don't do
things which you think are good deeds but have bad outcomes. If
animals liberation will cause imbalance to the nature, that means
we are doing it without wisdom but I think that is only minority.
Majority of the Buddhists release fishes into the deep sea which is
their habitat.